博客

  • RWA 早报 | 2026年9月29日

    RWA 早报 | 2026年9月29日

    RWA DAILY

    代币化资产持有者版图生变,机构抵押品与欧洲储备规则同迎拐点

    RWA 链上分布市值
    $38.58亿
    rwa.xyz · 9月28日

    BNB Chain RWA 持有者
    188.3万
    全网第一

    代币化股票市值
    $30亿
    突破关口

    FOBXX 七日收益率
    3.57%
    富兰克林 OnChain 基金

    BNB Chain 超越以太坊与 Solana,成代币化 RWA 持有者最多的公链

    2026年9月28日 · RWA Foundation / BlockInsider
    RWA Foundation 9 月 28 日数据显示,BNB Chain 以 188.3 万个 RWA 持有钱包跃居各链之首,超越 Robinhood Chain(144.4 万)、Solana(69.8 万)与以太坊(27.5 万)。但以太坊仍以 44.26% 的份额领跑 RWA 分布价值,BNB Chain 占 14.51%、年内新增约 $36 亿。持有者数量与资产价值的背离,勾勒出代币化采用的不同切面。
    • BNB Chain 持有者规模约为 Solana 的 2.7 倍、以太坊的近 7 倍,代币化股票是主要增量来源
    • Binance Wallet 9 月 25 日起支持 USDT 支付 Gas(覆盖 BSC/以太坊/Solana/TRON),降低跨链稳定币使用门槛
    • USDC/USD1/U 零费率活动延续至 9 月 30 日,已为链上用户覆盖超 $450 万 Gas 费
    格局信号
    价值与用户两套度量分道扬镳,BNB 走”用户广度”路线

    生态打法
    零费率 + USDT Gas + 零售活动($400 万 Stonks Season)齐发力

    趋势含义
    RWA 采用从”机构囤值”转向”散户触达”的用户数叙事

    来源:BlockInsider · RWA Foundation · 2026年9月28日

    Avalanche 单周代币化股票净流入 $1.31 亿领跑全网,持仓者 170 万居首

    2026年9月28日 · Token Terminal / CryptoNomist
    Avalanche 过去七天录得 $1.312 亿代币化股票净流入,超过同赛道其余所有被追踪公链的总和。截至 9 月 25 日的一个月内,Avalanche 代币化股权市值新增 $2.521 亿,为第二名 BNB Chain($1.222 亿)的两倍有余。代币化股票作为资产类别市值已突破 $30 亿,Avalanche 约占 7.5%,链上持有者约 170 万为全网最高。
    • 6 月 Dinari 在 Avalanche C-Chain 部署逾 350 只代币化美股/ETF/REIT(含 SpaceX 上市前股份),初期免除交易费
    • 日本 Progmat 迁移约 $20 亿代币化证券至专属 Avalanche Layer 1,BlackRock BUIDL 亦有资金流入
    • Avalanche RWA 锁仓总值 2026 年底已达 $16–20 亿,合规先行路线(Dinari/Progmat)成为关键
    赛道焦点
    代币化股票成链间争夺主战场,Avalanche 凭合规部署领跑

    增长动能
    $131M 周流入 + $30 亿板块市值,资本加速向专注型 L1 迁移

    网络效应
    170 万持有者持续贡献 AVAX Gas 费,形成自增强循环

    来源:CryptoCortex · Token Terminal · 2026年9月28日

    Bybit × 富兰克林邓普顿:代币化货币基金份额首作场外抵押品,布局 Mantle 钱包产品

    2026年9月28日 · Franklin Templeton / Bybit
    富兰克林邓普顿与 Bybit 宣布战略合作,首个落地项目允许合格机构客户将 Benji 平台发行的代币化货币市场基金份额,作为 Bybit 交易的场外抵押品。客户经 ByCustody 质押 BENJI 份额,即可获得 USDT/USDC 交易授信,底层资产始终留存于场外托管、价值实时镜像,持仓收益与交易流动性兼得。
    • Franklin OnChain 美国政府货币基金 FOBXX 净值约 $6.87 亿,七日现价收益率 3.57%、有效收益率 3.63%
    • 继 2 月 Binance 之后,Bybit 成为第二家接受 BENJI 代币作抵押的大型交易所
    • 合作还将延伸至 Bybit 与 Mantle 链上的钱包端代币化财富产品,覆盖散户投资策略
    机构范式
    收益型基金份额可作抵押撬动杠杆,TradFi 资产嵌入交易所资金流

    行业信号
    BENJI 跨平台抵押成标配,富兰克林已连下 Binance/OKX/Bybit

    零售延伸
    Mantle 链钱包财富产品将把专业策略带给链上散户

    来源:UseTheBitcoin · Crypto.News · 2026年9月28日

    欧元体系提议取消 MiCA 稳定币银行准备金下限,改以流动性期限分层

    2026年9月28日 · European Central Banks / Stobox
    欧洲央行体系在 MiCA 咨询回应中提议,取消稳定币发行人须持有至少 30% 储备为银行存款(重要代币 60%)的硬性下限,改为要求储备资产中须有一定比例在一至五个工作日内到期。该提案旨在以流动性分层替代存款占比约束,最终由欧盟委员会定夺,或将重塑稳定币储备的资产配置逻辑。
    • 现行 MiCA 规则:稳定币须将 30% 储备存于银行,重要代币提至 60%
    • 欧元体系建议以”最短到期资产占比”取代存款下限,更贴近高流动性资产管理实践
    • 提案属咨询回应、不具约束力,最终走向取决于欧盟委员会立法议程
    监管取向
    从”存款占比”转向”流动性分层”,为储备管理松绑

    稳定币影响
    发行人储备配置更灵活,短久期资产需求或上升

    联动效应
    与 CFTC 代币化抵押品、SEC 代币化证券指引同步推进

    来源:Stobox Weekly Digest · European System of Central Banks · 2026年9月28日

  • Compliance-by-Cryptography: Can ZK Proofs Gate Agentic Finance?

    Compliance-by-Cryptography: Can ZK Proofs Gate Agentic Finance?

    Compliance-by-Cryptography: Can ZK Proofs Gate Agentic Finance?

    After the CLARITY Act stalled in the Senate, U.S. regulators are shifting to administrative rulemaking. Peirce’s farewell speech put “zero-knowledge compliance” into the official record, and the identity layer for AI-agent payments is becoming the next infrastructure battleground.

    CLARITY Act Senate procedural vote
    49-50
    Stalled, legislative path blocked

    Regulation Crypto Assets exemption cap
    $75M
    SEC proposed registration exemption

    AI-agent on-chain payments (12 mo)
    $73M
    About 176M tx, Keyrock basis

    SEC commissioners after Peirce exits 10/2
    2
    Atkins + Uyeda; quorum possible

    U.S. digital-asset regulation is entering a rare “vacuum”: Congress has stalled, and regulators are being forced to fill the gap with administrative action. Beneath the surface, a deeper shift is underway. In her farewell speech on September 23, SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce publicly framed zero-knowledge proofs as a compliance tool rather than an evasion tool, arguing that cryptographic proofs should replace data-hoarding KYC/AML practices. This is exactly the missing piece for agentic finance: machines have no “identity,” yet they must prove they are compliant.

    This week (9/23-9/28) a clear thread ran through the U.S. market: a regulatory vacuum plus an AI-agent compliance identity layer. Three seemingly unrelated stories, the stalled CLARITY Act, Peirce pushing ZK compliance, and Baselayer/Socure betting on agent identity infrastructure, all point to the same conclusion: as AI agents begin to transact autonomously, the question of “who you are” is shifting from collecting identities to proving what you can demonstrate.

    1. Why It Matters: Congress Stalls, Agencies Fill the Gap

    On September 15, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) failed a 49-50 procedural vote in the Senate, with disagreements centered on officials’ crypto holdings and stablecoin yield. Before the November midterms, congressional crypto legislation is all but stalled. So the SEC and CFTC are each acting on their own: the SEC is advancing Regulation Crypto Assets, proposing registration exemptions up to $5 million and $75 million for crypto startups, with public comments open through October 20; CFTC Chairman Michael Selig confirmed the agency will use its existing authority to shape market structure and has sent a comprehensive regulatory proposal to the White House.

    For practitioners, a “legislative vacuum” does not mean no rules; it means the granularity of regulation shifts from congressional statutes to agency rules. Uncertainty has not disappeared, it has merely changed its source.

    2. Current State: Peirce’s Farewell Speech Puts ZK on the Record

    At the SIFMA Digital Assets Conference in New York on September 23, Peirce, who steps down on October 2, delivered what amounts to a farewell manifesto. She criticized the current KYC/AML regime for resting on the flawed premise of “collecting more and more data,” describing regulators as piling up “ever bigger data haystacks” and turning financial rails into a “panopticon.” She argued for zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) and attribute-based credentials that verify age, accredited-investor status, or sanctions-clearance without exposing name, address, or income.

    This is not abstract: the SEC’s Crypto Task Force met with ZK-identity firm Aztec as early as July 17 to discuss its ZKPassport system, which verifies government IDs locally on the device and outputs only a cryptographic proof of whether a condition is met. Peirce’s speech, now part of the official SEC record, is a citable federal artifact and marks the first time “data minimization” has entered institutional regulatory discourse as a principle.

    3. Deep Dive: From “You Must Be Named” to “You Must Be Able to Prove”

    Peirce’s proposal goes straight to the heart of agentic finance. In August, Coinbase formally introduced AiFi (Agentic Finance): when AI agents research, decide, and execute on behalf of individuals and enterprises, they also need to pay, receive, hold, and transfer value, but the traditional financial system “assumes a real person behind every transaction,” which for machines means broken flows. Coinbase’s Agent Wallet attempts to give agents on-chain identity, but whether regulators will accept such an “identity” remains unsettled.

    This is where “compliance by cryptography” proves its worth. Unlike humans, AI agents cannot open accounts and submit ID documents one by one; but they can hold an attribute credential issued by a trusted party and use ZK to prove to a counterparty “I am authorized to make this payment of no more than X” or “I have passed sanctions screening,” without exposing their internal logic. The agentic commerce panel at EastPoint: Seoul 2026 (9/28) reinforced this: Kite AI’s Cindy Shi stressed that for agents to transact autonomously at millisecond speed, firms must build a “delegated authority” structure with separate permissions by task, country, transaction type, and limit, rather than simply “handing a credit card to a child.”

    At the infrastructure layer, capital is flooding into this identity segment: Baselayer raised a $35 million Series A and launched Agentic Identity Suite to verify AI agents transacting on behalf of humans; Socure (valued at $5.2 billion) is folding Fravity’s agentic AI into its stack and integrating on-chain identity verification with Circle Arc, a network built for the agent economy; Keyrock reports that AI agents settled more than $73 million across roughly 176 million transactions on-chain over the past 12 months. Identity and trust decisions are moving from after-the-fact accountability to the front of every automated payment.

    4. Investment View: Identity Layer and Compliance Stack Become a New Track

    The market has already begun pricing this shift. The ZK sector rose about 3-5% overall after Peirce’s speech; modest in the short term, but if “compliance by cryptography” becomes the SEC’s mainstream path, KYC/AML/tax reporting could all run through on-chain circuits, sharply cutting institutional compliance costs for entering DeFi. Meanwhile, the spot Solana ETF, listed less than eight weeks ago, hit a single-day inflow peak of $86.7 million and pushed AUM past $1.5 billion, with institutions directly comparing “allocating to SOL ETF” versus “allocating to short-term Treasuries.” The valuation premium of compliance-identity vendors such as Socure and Baselayer reflects market bets on the “front-end authority” of the agent era.

    The risks are just as real: ZK compliance today has neither a legal definition nor a regulatory sandbox, and with only Atkins and Uyeda left on the SEC after Peirce departs, whether this direction survives depends entirely on her successors. Agentic payments still concentrate in low-value API calls, and before they scale, accountability must be settled. When an agent executes a payment beyond its instructions, whether the liability falls on the user, the model developer, or the platform has no clear answer yet.

    5. Consumer and User View: Permissions as a Shield, Not a Constraint

    For ordinary users, the most tangible result of “compliance by cryptography” is not abstract regulation but a change in how payments are authorized. At the EastPoint: Seoul 2026 panel, Kite AI compared giving an agent authority to “handing a credit card to a child”; what is really needed is not handing over the card but setting permissions by task, country, transaction type, and limit. Google Cloud’s Joe Hwang added that because AI models can produce wrong outputs, deterministic controls must be built outside the model: identity checks, security safeguards, and spending caps. In other words, users will gain a more granular “digital wallet remote control,” where every automated agent payment runs on a revocable, auditable rail rather than an unrecoverable key.

    6. Conclusion: Where the Opportunity Lies

    The U.S. regulatory vacuum is pushing “compliance by cryptography” from slogan to executable infrastructure. Two directions deserve attention: first, zero-knowledge identity and attribute-based credentials, which solve privacy and compliance at once and are the technical base for an agent to earn “provable trust”; second, agent delegation authority and accountability frameworks, from “authorization by exception” to “who is responsible for exceeding authority,” which will be the precondition for machine finance to truly scale. Whoever first builds a verifiable agent identity layer holds the front-end key to payments for the next decade.

    Key signal: The CLARITY Act’s failure pushes U.S. digital-asset regulation toward administrative rulemaking; Peirce’s farewell speech framed zero-knowledge proofs as a “compliance technology” for the first time, shifting regulation from “you must be named” to “you must be able to prove.” The identity and permission layer for AI-agent payments (Baselayer, Socure x Circle Arc, Kite AI) is becoming the new infrastructure battleground after payment rails.
    1
    Administrative fill-in replaces legislation: certainty further away, granularity finerAfter CLARITY’s 49-50 failure, the SEC and CFTC advance their own agendas (Regulation Crypto Assets, a White House proposal). For practitioners, the basis of compliance shifts from congressional statute to agency rule, and comment periods and hearings (deadline 10/20) become the new arena.

    2
    ZK compliance enters the official record, creating citable institutional leverageIn a published SEC speech, Peirce framed KYC/AML data-hoarding as a “haystack problem” and a “panopticon,” arguing attribute credentials should replace name-based collection, the first time data minimization has entered U.S. federal regulatory discourse and a practical moat for privacy-first projects.

    3
    An AI agent’s “identity” is defined by proof, not by an accountMachines cannot open accounts and submit documents, but they can hold a trusted-issued attribute credential and use ZK to prove compliance. Coinbase’s AiFi, Agent Wallet, and Kite AI’s delegated-authority structure all point to “verifiable agent identity” as a new primitive.

    4
    Accountability is the unsettled question before scaleWho is responsible when an agent exceeds its authority? Moving authorization from “off by default” to “open by exception” requires machine-readable delegation mandates, policy logs independent of the model, and a layered allocation of responsibility from user to platform.

  • 美国监管真空期:合规即密码学,能否成为AI agent金融的入场券?

    美国监管真空期:合规即密码学,能否成为AI agent金融的入场券?

    美国监管真空期:合规即密码学,能否成为AI agent金融的入场券?

    CLARITY法案在参议院搁浅后,美国监管天平转向”行政造规则”。而Peirce告别演讲把”零知识合规”写进官方记录,AI agent支付的身份层正成为下一个基础设施战场。

    CLARITY法案参议院程序投票
    49-50
    搁浅,立法路径受阻

    Regulation Crypto Assets 豁免上限
    $75M
    SEC拟推注册豁免

    AI agent 链上支付量(12个月)
    $73M
    约1.76亿笔,Keyrock口径

    Peirce 10/2卸任后 SEC 委员数
    2人
    Atkins + Uyeda,法定半数即可议事

    美国数字资产监管正进入一个罕见的”真空期”:国会立法停滞,监管机构被迫用行政手段补位。而在这个窗口里,一个更深远的变化正在发生。SEC委员Hester Peirce在9月23日的告别演讲中,公开把”零知识证明”定义为合规工具而非规避工具,主张用密码学证明替代数据堆砌式的KYC/AML。这正是AI agent金融真正落地所缺的那块拼图:机器没有”身份”,却必须证明自己”合规”。

    本周(9/23-9/28)美国市场出现了一条清晰的主线:监管真空 + AI agent合规身份层。三条看似独立的新闻(CLARITY法案搁浅、Peirce力推ZK合规、Baselayer/Socure等押注agent身份基础设施)实际上指向同一个判断:当AI agent开始自主交易,”你是谁”这个问题,将从实名采集演变为”你能证明什么”。

    一、为什么关注:立法停摆,行政补位

    9月15日,关键的数字资产市场清晰度法案(CLARITY Act,H.R. 3633)在参议院以49-50的程序投票搁浅,分歧集中在官员持仓与稳定币收益处理。在11月中期选举前,国会对加密的立法几乎无望推进。于是SEC与CFTC转而各自出手:SEC正在推进Regulation Crypto Assets提案,为加密初创提供最高500万与7500万美元两档注册豁免,公众评议截至10月20日;CFTC主席Michael Selig确认将动用现有职权塑造市场结构,并已把一揽子监管提案送交白宫审批。

    对从业者而言,”立法真空”并不等于”无法可依”,而是意味着监管的颗粒度将从国会立法转向机构规则,不确定性并未消除,只是换了来源。

    二、行业现状:Peirce告别演讲,把ZK写进官方记录

    9月23日在纽约SIFMA数字资产大会上,即将于10月2日卸任的SEC委员Peirce发表了堪称”告别宣言”的演讲。她抨击现行KYC/AML建立在”收集越来越多的数据”这一错误前提上,形容监管者正在堆砌”越来越大的数据草堆”,把金融轨道变成”全景监狱”(panopticon)。她主张用零知识证明(ZKP)与基于属性的凭证,在不暴露姓名、地址、收入的前提下,验证年龄、合格投资者身份或是否被列入制裁名单。

    这不是空谈:SEC内部Crypto Task Force早在7月17日就与零知识身份公司Aztec讨论过其ZKPassport系统(政府证件在设备本地核验、只输出”是否符合某条件”的密码学证明)。Peirce的演讲被收录进SEC官方记录,成为可引用的联邦文件,首次把”数据最小化”作为监管原则写进制度话语。

    三、深度分析:从”你必须实名”到”你必须能证明”

    Peirce的提议直指AI agent金融的命门。Coinbase在8月正式提出AiFi(Agentic Finance)概念:当AI agent代表个人与企业调研、决策并执行操作时,它们同样需要付款、收款、持有与划转,但传统金融体系”默认每笔交易背后是一个真人”——这对机器意味着流程直接中断。Coinbase的Agent Wallet试图为AI agent提供链上身份,但监管是否接受这种”身份”仍无定论。

    这正是”合规即密码学”的价值所在。与人类不同,AI agent无法逐一开户、提交身份证件;但它可以持有一份受信任实体签发的属性凭证,用ZK向对手方证明”我有权执行这笔不超过X金额的支付””我已通过制裁筛查”,而不暴露自身内部逻辑。EastPoint: Seoul 2026(9/28)的agentic commerce专题也印证了这一点:Kite AI的Cindy Shi强调,要让agent在毫秒级自主交易,必须建立按任务、国家、交易类型与额度分别授权的”委托权限”结构,而不是简单”把信用卡交给孩子”。

    基础设施层面,资本正在涌入这个身份层:Baselayer以3500万美元A轮推出Agentic Identity Suite,专注验证代表人类交易的AI agent;Socure(估值52亿美元)整合Fravity的agentic AI技术,并与Circle Arc(面向agent经济的网络)集成链上身份核验;Keyrock报告称过去12个月AI agent在链上已结算超过7300万美元、约1.76亿笔交易。身份与信任决策,正从”事后追责”前移到”每次自动支付的前端”。

    四、投资视角:身份层与合规栈成新赛道

    市场对这一转向已有定价信号。ZK赛道在Peirce演讲后整体上涨约3-5%,尽管短期有限,但若”合规即密码学”成为SEC主流路径,KYC/AML/税务申报都可能通过链上电路完成,将显著降低机构进入DeFi的合规成本。与此同时,Solana现货ETF上市不满8周单日流入峰值达8670万美元、AUM冲上15亿美元,机构资金正把”配SOL ETF vs 配短债”做直接比较。合规身份厂商(如Socure、Baselayer)的估值溢价,反映了市场对”agent时代前端口令权”的押注。

    风险同样真实:ZK合规目前既无法律定义也无监管沙盒,Peirce卸任后SEC仅剩Atkins与Uyeda两名委员,这一方向能否延续完全取决于继任者;而agentic支付仍集中在低价值API调用,规模化前还需解决责任归属。当agent执行超出指令的支付,责任究竟落在用户、模型开发者还是平台上,目前没有清晰答案。

    五、消费者与用户视角:权限是护身符,不是束缚

    对普通用户而言,”合规即密码学”最直观的落地不是抽象监管,而是支付授权方式的改变。EastPoint: Seoul 2026专题上,Kite AI把”给agent授权”比作”把信用卡交给孩子”,而真正需要的不是把卡塞过去,而是按任务、国家、交易类型与额度分别设定权限。Google Cloud的Joe Hwang则强调,由于AI模型可能输出错误结果,必须在模型之外构建确定性控制:身份校验、安全防护、支出上限。换言之,用户将拥有更精细的”数字钱包遥控器”,agent的每一笔自动支付都跑在可撤销、可审计的轨道上,而不是一把无法收回的钥匙。

    六、结论:机会点

    美国监管真空正在倒逼”合规即密码学”从口号走向可执行的基础设施。值得从业者关注的两个方向:其一,零知识身份与基于属性的凭证,它们同时解决隐私与合规,是AI agent获得”可证明的信任”的技术底座;其二,agent委托权限与责任框架,从”按例外授权”到”谁对越权负责”的制度设计,将是机器金融真正规模化的前置条件。谁先建立可验证的agent身份层,谁就握住了下一个十年的支付前端口令。

    关键信号:CLARITY法案搁浅把美国数字资产监管推向行政造规则;Peirce告别演讲首次将零知识证明定义为”合规技术”,监管正从”你必须实名”转向”你必须能证明”。AI agent支付的身份与权限层(Baselayer、Socure×Circle Arc、Kite AI)正成为继支付轨道之后的新基础设施战场。
    1
    行政补位取代立法:确定性更远,颗粒度更细CLARITY 49-50搁浅后,SEC/CFTC各自推进(Regulation Crypto Assets、白宫送审提案)。对从业者而言,合规依据从国会法案变为机构规则,评论期与听证会(10/20截止)成为新的博弈场。

    2
    ZK合规首次进入官方记录,构成可引用的制度杠杆Peirce在SEC官方演讲中把KYC/AML数据堆砌定性为”草堆难题”与”全景监狱”,主张属性凭证替代实名采集,这是数据最小化原则第一次进入美国联邦监管话语,也是隐私优先项目的现实护城河。

    3
    AI agent的”身份”由证明而非账户定义机器无法开户提交证件,却能持有受信任签发的属性凭证、用ZK证明合规。Coinbase AiFi、Agent Wallet与Kite AI的委托权限结构,共同指向”可验证的agent身份”这一新原语。

    4
    责任归属是规模化前的未解命题agent越权支付该由谁负责?当授权从”默认关闭”改为”按例外开放”,需要可机器读取的授权委托书、独立于模型的策略日志,以及从用户到平台的责任分层。

  • 立法失灵,央行接棒:美联储给稳定币写下 1:1 硬约束

    立法失灵,央行接棒:美联储给稳定币写下 1:1 硬约束

    立法失灵,央行接棒:美联储给稳定币写下 1:1 硬约束

    CLARITY 法案折戟一周后,美联储带着 GENIUS 法案的实施细则登场:稳定币从”共识资产”被改写成受资本约束、每周上报、两日内兑付的支付工具。

    文章解读

    9 月 24 日,美联储公布 GENIUS 法案下的首套稳定币实施规则:发行方须以 93 天以内的短期国债等合格资产 100% 足额储备、两个工作日内兑付,并按规模承担 1%-2% 的运营风险资本。这套细则把美国稳定币从”谁能发”的灰色地带推入”监管银行化”的成法轨道。与此同时,SEC 与 CFTC 在 9 月 24-25 日更新加密 FAQ,继续用现有职权修补立法空白。CLARITY 折戟后,美国加密监管的工地正从国会搬到三家机构。

    1:1 储备与分层资本:稳定币被改写成”受监管的支付工具”

    9 月 24 日,美联储理事会就 GENIUS 法案下的两套配套提案公开征求意见。第一套针对它监管的支付型稳定币发行方,第二套为受美联储监管的银行设立通过子公司发行稳定币的申请程序。两项提案的评论窗口为《联邦公报》刊出后的 60 天。这是 GENIUS 法案自 2025 年 7 月签署成为美国首部加密立法以来,最接近落地执行的一步。

    储备要求是这套规则的核心。发行方需时刻持有不低于流通中代币面值的合格储备资产,合格清单收得很窄:现金、美联储余额、受保存款、93 天以内到期的美国国债、以及由国债担保的隔夜回购。只持有这些资产的基金及其代币化版本也可入列。一旦储备出现缺口,发行方须立即通知美联储,并在获批整改计划前清算储备、兑付代币。

    监管维度 核心要求 关键数字
    储备 1:1 足额、时刻成立,合格资产清单窄 93 天以内国债
    兑付 公开兑付政策,两个工作日内完成 T+2 营业日
    运营资本 按流通量分层计提运营风险资本 2%→1.5%→1%
    附加资本 非储备收入按三年均值计提 25%
    监督 全面检查 + 每周机密报告 ≥12 月 / 每周

    资本要求是这套规则的创新点。运营风险资本按规模递减:流通量首 20 亿美元按 2% 计提,其后 30 亿美元按 1.5%,超过 50 亿美元的部分按 1%。叠加一层等于非储备活动三年平均收入 25% 的附加资本,另对无保险存款和抵押不足的回购交易单独征收 2% 的信用风险资本。按此测算,一个 100 亿美元规模的发行方需持有约 13.5 亿美元运营资本,占总流通量的 1.35%。如果发行方连续两个季度末触及资本红线,则需清算储备并兑付全部代币。

    “While the board’s proposal is an important step in GENIUS Act implementation, further work will undoubtedly be required if stablecoins are to be reliable payment instruments.”
    — Governor Michael Barr, Federal Reserve Statement, Sept 24, 2026

    规则同时执行 GENIUS 法案的收益禁令,并沿用 OCC 的做法,推定部分第三方安排会突破该禁令,这直接波及把储备收益转给持有人的平台。美联储理事 Michael Barr 支持该提案,但公开提出几处缺口:储备资产的市场价格会波动,需评估利率与外汇风险;应确保压力时期仍能按面值兑付的普遍赎回权;以及提案仅在洗钱缺陷”重大或系统性”时才介入,这一标准的监督效果未知。市场端,DefiLlama 数据显示 9 月 26 日全球稳定币总供应约 3130 亿美元,其中 USDT 占约 59%、USDC 占约 24%。GENIUS 法案将于 2027 年 1 月 18 日或最终规则公布后 120 天(取其先)生效。

    SEC 与 CFTC 的 FAQ:行政路径在给”证券边界”松绑

    稳定币走的是 GENIUS 成法路径,加密市场结构则靠行政路径续命。9 月 24-25 日,SEC 与 CFTC 前后脚更新了各自的加密 FAQ。SEC 公司财务部在 9 月 25 日发布的九条 FAQ 中明确:对一个已正常运作的网络宣布代币回购,本身不会让该代币落入 Howey 测试下的”投资合同”。网络升级同理:一旦系统具备功能,为其提供安全、维护、改进或推动网络效应的服务,都不再算作”管理性努力”。

    但边界没有被无限放开。对尚未具备功能的网络,若发行方把回购宣传成持有人的收益或回报来源,便会重新构成对管理性努力的承诺。SEC 同时给部分流动性质押凭证定了性:作为数字商品凭证时属”数字工具”,由基于协议的流动性质押提供方发行时,本身会被归为数字商品。CFTC 则在 9 月 24 日更新 FAQ,允许期货公司与清算机构在满足投资与托管要求的前提下,把客户资金投入此前已获批资产的代币化版本,并允许受监管机构用区块链记账,前提是区块链或区块浏览器不可用时仍能提供记录。

    “Once a crypto system is functional, services to secure, maintain, improve, or enhance such a system or its functionality, or to facilitate network effects, would not count as the kind of managerial effort under the Howey test.”
    — SEC Division of Corporation Finance, Crypto FAQ, Sept 25, 2026

    这两份 FAQ 都不具备法律强制力,仅是工作人员观点,但信号明确:在 CLARITY 法案于 9 月 15 日以 49:50 折戟后,三家机构(SEC、CFTC、美联储)正各自用现有职权把规则写下去。SEC 早已在 9 月 17 日抛出针对代币化证券交易平台的”创新豁免”,CFTC 也把一套更广的加密市场规则提交白宫审查。SEC 加密事务的旗手、委员 Hester Peirce 将于 10 月 2 日卸任,其主导的加密工作组议程不随人走,但规则推进的节奏常随人事波动。行政路径的脆弱性在于:机构规则可被下一届政府重写、被法院推翻、被未来立法取代,它比成文法的”脚手架”薄得多。

    对从业者的一些启示

    1
    稳定币进入”储备即合规”的成法时代
    美联储把合格储备收窄到 93 天以内国债与现金等价物,等于把商业票据、企业债、链上资产全部排除在支付稳定币的储备之外。USDC、USDP、PYUSD 这类银行侧发行方是明确受益者,而依赖收益分成的平台将因收益禁令被重估。发行方应把储备构成、兑付时效与资本计提当成产品设计的一部分,而不是合规部的附庸。

    2
    “大而不倒”的稳定币将承担真金白银的资本成本
    分层资本要求把规模变成成本函数:越大的发行方,需锁定的运营资本绝对值越高(100 亿美元规模约需 13.5 亿美元)。这对追求规模效应的头部发行方是结构性约束,对中小发行方则是一道隐性门槛。资本计提、每周上报、年度全面检查意味着稳定币从”轻资产协议”转向”重资本、重运营”的银行化生意,利润率与商业模式需要重新测算。

    3
    证券边界的行政松动不等于没有边界
    SEC 明确放行已运作网络上的回购与升级,但对”未运作网络 + 以收益为饵”仍保留红线。从业者不应把 FAQ 的宽松读成全面松绑。Howey 测试的判断高度依赖个案。做回购、做质押、做营销时,关键看网络是否已具备功能、是否承诺收益来源,这两条是行政路径下最清晰的合规分水岭。

    4
    行政路径的”脚手架”是脆弱的,别把五年豁免当永久法
    SEC 的代币化证券豁免是临时且条件性的,CFTC 的规则仍待 OIRA 审查,任何机构规则都会被下一届政府或法院推翻。加上 Peirce 10 月 2 日卸任,加密工作组的推进节奏存在不确定性。在 CLARITY 尚未彻底死透、2027 年仍存立法窗口的前提下,机构在按机构规则投入重资产建设时,需为”成文法覆盖”预留合规重做的预算与路径。

  • Clearing House Taps Quant to Bridge Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    Clearing House Taps Quant to Bridge Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    Clearing House Taps Quant to Bridge Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    A
    Aurellix
    September 28, 2026
    1 min read

    Today’s Focus
    US payments clearing core TCH has selected Quant to build the interoperability layer that bridges tokenized deposits, sending QNT up 75% in a day; tokenized stocks have jumped fivefold this year to $4.43B, with a five-year SEC exemption paving the way for the first compliant on-exchange venue in Q4. Arbitrum became the first chain with 7,000+ RWAs, while over a million wallets on Solana hold tokenized stocks.

    Industry Flash

    10 updates

  • US clearing house TCH taps Quant to bridge tokenized deposits — QNT rose about 75% in a day and nearly 185% on the week, targeting launch in H1 2027 across a clearing pipeline handling $2T+ daily.
  • Tokenized stocks jump fivefold this year to $4.43B — their share of RWA climbed from 4.9% to 13.0%, and the SEC’s five-year innovation exemption could bring the first compliant on-exchange venue online as soon as Q4.
  • Arbitrum becomes the first chain with 7,000+ RWAs — doubling in six weeks to 7,083 assets with $1.03B in distributed value, driven by tokenized stocks and Treasury products.
  • Solana’s stablecoins, RWAs and tokenized stocks all hit all-time highs the same day — wallets holding tokenized stocks topped 1 million, SOL rose about 12.6% on the week, and the market sits in “greed” territory.
  • Tokenized Treasuries and money-market funds reach $149.4B in circulation — BUIDL earns a 98% collateral haircut on Deribit, letting institutions post tokenized funds as margin without redeeming.
  • Citi: 77% of institutions are exploring tokenized collateral — tokenized assets are moving from “issue and hold” toward mainstream margin and settlement pipelines at clearing houses.
  • Mantle sets back-to-back RWA records: 1,473 assets, $476M in distributed value — asset count is up more than 20x from 71 at the start of the year, with xStocks, Securitize, Ethena and Paxos issuing on-chain.
  • Malaysia’s Luno, Halogen and Kenanga explore a ringgit stablecoin, UMYR, for settlement — the plan uses UMYR for real-time DvP settlement of tokenized money-market funds in a closed, institution-only loop.
  • Ripple and Securitize enable instant swaps of BUIDL and VBILL for RLUSD — a 24/7 stablecoin off-ramp for tokenized Treasuries as RLUSD supply nears $2.5B.
  • Ethena extends USDe backing to tokenized US equities — the synthetic dollar’s collateral mix now reaches tokenized equities, diversifying yield and stability sources.
  • 清算所搭桥 Quant 打通代币化存款,代币化股票年内翻五倍

    清算所搭桥 Quant 打通代币化存款,代币化股票年内翻五倍

    A
    Aurellix
    2026年9月28日
    1 分钟阅读

    今日焦点
    美国支付清算核心 TCH 选定 Quant 搭建互操作层打通代币化存款,QNT 单日涨 75%;代币化股票年内翻五倍至 $44.3 亿,SEC 五年豁免催生 Q4 首个合规场内交易平台。Arbitrum 成首个 RWA 破 7,000 的公链,Solana 百万钱包持有代币化股票。

    行业速报

    共 10 条

  • 美国清算所 TCH 选定 Quant 打通代币化存款 — QNT 单日涨约 75%、周涨近 185%,目标 2027 上半年上线,锚定日均 2 万亿美元以上清算管道。
  • 代币化股票年内翻五倍至 $44.3 亿 — 占 RWA 比例从 4.9% 升至 13.0%,SEC 五年创新豁免下首个合规场内交易平台最快 Q4 上线。
  • Arbitrum 成首个 RWA 破 7,000 的公链 — 六周翻倍至 7,083 项、分布价值 $10.3 亿,代币化股票与美债产品驱动目录扩张。
  • Solana 稳定币、RWA、代币化股票三大生态同日创历史新高 — 持有代币化股票钱包突破 100 万,SOL 七日涨约 12.6%,市场处「贪婪」区间。
  • 代币化美债与货基流通价值达 $1,494 亿 — BUIDL 在 Deribit 获 98% 抵押折算率,机构可将代币化基金直接作保证金而无需赎回。
  • Citi:77% 机构正布局代币化抵押品 — 代币化资产正从「发行持有」迈向清算所抵押与结算的主流资金管道。
  • Mantle RWA 连续创新高:1,473 项资产、分布价值 $4.76 亿 — 资产数从年初 71 项增逾 20 倍,xStocks、Securitize、Ethena、Paxos 多机构发行。
  • 马来西亚 Luno×Halogen×Kenanga 探索林吉特稳定币 UMYR 结算 — 拟以 UMYR 对代币化货基做实时 DvP 结算,机构白名单内闭环运行。
  • Ripple×Securitize:BUIDL 与 VBILL 可即时兑换 RLUSD — 为代币化国债提供 24/7 稳定币退出通道,RLUSD 供应逼近 $25 亿。
  • Ethena 扩展 USDe 抵押策略至代币化美股 — 合成美元抵押组合进一步向代币化股权资产开放,收益与稳定性来源多元化。
  • Clearing House Taps Quant for US Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    Clearing House Taps Quant for US Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    Clearing House Taps Quant for US Tokenized Deposits as Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold

    Tokenized Stock AUM
    $4.43B
    ▲ 390.4% (YTD)

    Stocks Share of RWA
    13.0%
    Up from 4.9% in Jan

    Arbitrum RWA Count
    7,083
    First chain past 7,000

    QNT 1-Day Gain
    +75%
    Clearing House catalyst

    The Clearing House Picks Quant to Bridge US Tokenized Deposits; QNT Surges 75% on Trillion-Dollar Rail

    September 27, 2026 · The Clearing House / UseTheBitcoin
    The Clearing House (TCH), the backbone of US payment clearing, selected Quant on September 24 to build the interoperability layer for its On-Chain Money Initiative, linking tokenized bank deposits to existing payment rails. TCH’s networks clear more than $2 trillion daily, with CHIPS processing over $2 trillion in average daily value. QNT jumped about 75% on September 27, briefly near $190, with weekly gains approaching 185%, becoming one of the largest cap movers of the day.
    • Quant will supply interoperability, orchestration and transaction management, connecting RTP and CHIPS while serving the 25 US banks that own TCH, with a target launch in H1 2027
    • TCH will also offer Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service so institutions without their own infrastructure can access the shared network
    • QNT is a governance and utility token; the rally reflects a repricing of the institutional tokenization-infrastructure narrative rather than direct demand
    Milestone
    Tokenized deposits move from proof-of-concept into a shared US bank clearing network anchored to $2T+ daily rails

    US-UK Sync
    After seven UK banks completed first live sterling deposit trades, Quant lands on both sides of the Atlantic

    Narrative Signal
    Capital is rotating into institutional tokenization infrastructure, with QNT and ONDO leading the RWA cycle

    Sources: UseTheBitcoin · Altcoin Buzz · Sep 27, 2026

    Tokenized Stocks Jump Fivefold to $4.43B as SEC Exemption Paves Way for First Q4 On-Chain Venue

    September 27, 2026 · Seoul Economic Daily / Kalkine
    Binance Research data shows global tokenized stock assets under management reached $4.43 billion as of September 15, up 390.4% from about $900 million at the start of the year, lifting equities’ share of the RWA market from 4.9% to 13.0%. Under the SEC’s Innovation Exemption, the first Tokenized Securities Venue is expected as early as Q4. Binance Research projects tokenized stocks could reach $349 billion by 2030 in its base case and $987 billion in a bullish scenario.
    • On-chain capital activation for tokenized stocks rose from 1.95% to 7.54% YTD, with liquidity pools at 65.4% and lending at 28.1%
    • The SEC exemption lets qualifying TSVs trade tokenized US-listed stocks on public blockchains via automated market makers and liquidity pools, requiring matching dividends and voting rights plus a 30-day issuer objection window
    • SEC crypto task force senior adviser Taylor Lindeman expects the first operator to disclose plans next quarter, with the framework running five years before durable rulemaking
    Regulatory Breakthrough
    The US opens a five-year conditional path for on-chain equity trading inside regulated venues

    Scale Ambition
    Currently just 0.0029% of global listed equity, with a 2030 bullish case of $987B and near-thousandfold headroom

    Paradigm Race
    The UK and EU are advancing in parallel, with cross-border competition shaping on-chain stock standards

    Sources: Seoul Economic Daily · Kalkine · Sep 27, 2026

    Arbitrum Becomes First Chain Past 7,000 RWAs, Doubling in Six Weeks to 7,083 Assets and $1.03B

    September 27, 2026 · RWA.xyz / Crypto Briefing
    Arbitrum One became the first blockchain to host more than 7,000 tokenized real-world assets, reaching 7,083 tokens with roughly $1.03 billion in distributed value and about $1.08 billion in 30-day transfer volume. Its RWA count more than doubled from roughly 3,000 in mid-August within six weeks, driven largely by tokenized equities and US Treasury products, with Franklin Templeton, Robinhood and Spiko actively participating.
    • Bitquery data shows excluding issuer wallets, roughly $1.01 billion is actually user-held, while about $4.42 billion of the $5.43 billion issued remains with issuers
    • Tokenized equities lead the mix, followed by US Treasuries and money-market products, plus gold and private credit
    • The Arbitrum DAO has long deployed treasury directly into RWA through its STEP program, with STEP 2.0 proposing 35M ARB for stable, liquid RWAs
    Milestone
    Arbitrum’s low-cost, high-throughput L2 holds the broadest RWA catalogue, though total value still trails Ethereum

    Reality Check
    About $4.42B of $5.43B issued remains with issuers; real circulation is roughly $1.01B

    Ecosystem Driver
    DAO treasury deployment plus institutional issuers (Franklin/Robinhood/Spiko) power the catalogue expansion

    Sources: Gokhshtein Media · TokenPost · Sep 27, 2026

    Solana Posts Simultaneous ATHs in Stablecoins, RWAs and Tokenized Stocks as Wallets Top One Million

    September 27, 2026 · Solana / SpendNode
    Solana’s official account said on September 27 that three parts of its on-chain economy set records at the same time: stablecoin supply at an all-time high, real-world assets at an all-time high, and more than one million wallets holding tokenized stocks. SOL traded near $121.94, up about 12.6% over seven days, with the Fear & Greed index at 73, in “Greed” territory.
    • Solana’s RWA ecosystem had earlier surpassed $4.4 billion, with Centrifuge launching HYB on Solana to further boost growth
    • The one-million-wallet tokenized-stock figure is a reach/distribution signal rather than a dollar-denominated one; no total value was disclosed
    • Three segments peaking together reflects a macro rotation of capital back into higher-beta assets amid risk appetite
    Ecosystem Synergy
    Stablecoin settlement, RWA yield and equity exposure all peak at once, positioning Solana as a multi-asset RWA hub

    Reach vs Depth
    The million-wallet figure leans on breadth; dollarized scale and activity data still need verification

    Macro Backdrop
    Risk-on sentiment lifts high-beta assets, with RWA tokens and stablecoin supply rising in tandem

    Sources: SpendNode · CoinNews · Sep 27, 2026

  • RWA 早报 | 2026年9月28日

    RWA 早报 | 2026年9月28日

    清算所选中 Quant 打通美国代币化存款,代币化股票年内翻五倍蓄势监管场内交易

    代币化股票 AUM
    $44.3亿
    ▲ 390.4% (年初至今)

    股票占 RWA 比例
    13.0%
    年初 4.9% → 13%

    Arbitrum RWA 数量
    7,083
    首个破 7000 的链

    QNT 单日涨幅
    +75%
    清算所选型催化

    美国清算所选 Quant 搭桥代币化存款,QNT 单日暴涨 75% 打通万亿级支付管道

    2026年9月27日 · The Clearing House / UseTheBitcoin
    美国支付清算核心机构 The Clearing House 于 9 月 24 日宣布选定 Quant 为其「On-Chain Money Initiative」提供互操作层技术,将代币化银行存款与传统支付网络打通。TCH 旗下网络每日清算超 2 万亿美元,CHIPS 日均处理超 2 万亿美元大额支付。QNT 在 9 月 27 日单日上涨约 75%,一度逼近 190 美元,周涨幅近 185%,成为当日最大市值异动之一。
    • Quant 将提供互操作、编排与交易管理层,连接 RTP 与 CHIPS 等既有美国支付管道,覆盖 25 家美国大行股东,目标 2027 年上半年上线
    • TCH 将同步提供 Tokenized Deposits-as-a-Service,让缺乏自建基础设施的机构也能接入共享网络
    • QNT 作为 Quant 生态的治理与工具代币,其价格暴涨更多反映市场对「机构级代币化基础设施」叙事的重估,而非直接需求驱动
    关键进展
    代币化存款从「概念验证」进入全美银行共享清算网络阶段,锚定日均 2 万亿+ 美元管道

    英美联动
    继英国七大行完成首批代币化英镑存款实盘交易后,Quant 在英美两线同时落地

    叙事信号
    资本正涌入「机构代币化基建」赛道,QNT 与 ONDO 等成为本轮 RWA 轮动核心

    来源:UseTheBitcoin · Altcoin Buzz · 2026年9月27日

    代币化股票年内翻五倍至 44 亿美元,SEC 创新豁免催生 Q4 首个合规场内交易平台

    2026年9月27日 · Seoul Economic Daily / Kalkine
    Binance Research 数据显示,截至 9 月 15 日全球代币化股票资产管理规模达 44.3 亿美元,较年初约 9 亿美元增长 390.4%,占 RWA 总市场比例从 4.9% 升至 13.0%。在 SEC 创新豁免框架下,首个代币化证券交易平台预计最快 Q4 上线,Binance Research 预测到 2030 年代币化股票市场在基准情形下可达 3490 亿美元,乐观情形下达 9870 亿美元。
    • 代币化股票链上资本激活率从年初 1.95% 升至 7.54%,其中流动性池占 65.4%、借贷占 28.1%
    • SEC 创新豁免允许符合条件的 TSV 通过自动做市与流动性池在公链交易美股,但须保证与标的相同分红投票权,发行方拥有 30 天异议期
    • SEC 加密工作组高级顾问 Lindeman 预计首批运营方将在下一季度公布运营计划,框架试行五年后据实况制定正式规则
    监管破局
    美国为链上美股交易开出五年有条件豁免,让代币化股票进入受监管场内市场

    规模想象
    当前仅占全球上市股市值 0.0029%,2030 年乐观情形对应 9870 亿美元,千倍空间

    范式竞争
    英国与欧盟同步推进,英美监管竞速将决定链上股票交易的标准制定权

    来源:Seoul Economic Daily · Kalkine · 2026年9月27日

    Arbitrum 成首个 RWA 破 7000 的公链,六周翻倍至 7,083 项、分布价值 10.3 亿美元

    2026年9月27日 · RWA.xyz / Crypto Briefing
    Arbitrum One 成为首个承载超过 7,000 项代币化 RWA 的公链,共托管 7,083 项资产、分布价值约 10.3 亿美元、30 天转移量约 10.8 亿美元。其 RWA 数量在 8 月中旬突破 3,000 项后六周内翻倍以上,主要由代币化股票与美国国债产品驱动,富兰克林坦伯顿、Robinhood、Spiko 等机构积极参与。
    • Bitquery 数据显示排除发行方钱包后,用户实际持有资产约 10.1 亿美元,已发行总量 54.3 亿美元中有 44.2 亿仍留存在发行方手中
    • 资产构成以代币化股票占比最高,其次为美国国债与货币市场产品,另有黄金与私人信贷
    • Arbitrum DAO 长期以 STEP 计划直接配置财务资产支持 RWA 生态,STEP 2.0 曾提出配置 3,500 万 ARB 于稳定具流动性的 RWA
    里程碑意义
    Arbitrum 凭低成本高吞吐 L2 成为 RWA 资产目录最广的链,但总价值仍落后以太坊

    数据冷思考
    已发行 54.3 亿美元中约 44.2 亿仍留存发行方,实际流通仅约 10 亿美元

    生态驱动
    DAO 直接配置 + 机构发行(Franklin/Robinhood/Spiko)双轮助推目录扩张

    来源:Gokhshtein Media · TokenPost · 2026年9月27日

    Solana 稳定币、RWA、代币化股票三大生态同日创历史新高,超百万钱包持有代币化股票

    2026年9月27日 · Solana 官方 / SpendNode
    Solana 官方 9 月 27 日宣布其链上三大生态同时创下历史新高:稳定币供应量、RWA 资产规模均达历史高点,且持有代币化股票的钱包数突破 100 万。SOL 当日约 121.9 美元,七日涨约 12.6%,风险偏好指数 Fear & Greed 升至 73,市场处于「贪婪」区间。
    • Solana RWA 生态早前已突破 44 亿美元,Centrifuge 在 Solana 推出 HYB 代币进一步助推生态扩张
    • 持有代币化股票的钱包数突破百万是「覆盖广度」信号,而非美元规模信号,官方未披露对应美元总额
    • 三大细分(稳定币结算层 / RWA 收益层 / 代币化股票)同步走高,反映资金回流高风险资产的宏观轮动
    生态协同
    稳定币结算层、RWA 收益层、股票敞口三线同步刷新,Solana 成为 RWA 多资产枢纽

    覆盖 vs 深度
    百万钱包更偏分布广度,美元化规模与活跃度数据仍需跟进验证

    宏观背景
    风险偏好回暖推动高贝塔资产走强,RWA 代币与稳定币供应同步受益

    来源:SpendNode · CoinNews · 2026年9月27日

  • 一个要松绑、一个要加码:欧洲央行与 EBA 正把 MiCA 推向两个方向

    一个要松绑、一个要加码:欧洲央行与 EBA 正把 MiCA 推向两个方向

    一个要松绑、一个要加码:欧洲央行与 EBA 正把 MiCA 推向两个方向

    在欧盟 MiCA 定向咨询 9 月 30 日截止前,欧洲央行体系主张砍掉稳定币的银行存款储备要求,EBA 却想把它伸进加密借贷与 DeFi,同一部法规正被两种力量反向拉扯。

    文章解读

    9 月 22 日,欧洲央行与 27 国央行以欧洲央行体系(ESCB)名义向欧盟委员会提交 MiCA 评估意见,建议取消稳定币发行人把 30%–60% 储备存放在银行存款的要求,改为按 1–5 个工作日的到期期限设流动性门槛;9 月 24 日,欧洲银行管理局(EBA)则在咨询意见中主张把加密借贷与 DeFi 通道纳入 MiCA 受监管服务清单,并给出适当性测试、杠杆上限与协议认证等工具。一个要松绑储备安全垫,一个要扩张监管边界,同一部法规正被两种力量反向拉扯。

    欧洲央行体系:把 30%–60% 的银行存款要求换成“期限门槛”

    9 月 22 日,欧洲央行(ECB)与欧盟全部 27 个成员国的中央银行以“欧洲央行体系”(ESCB)名义,向欧盟委员会提交了对 MiCA 定向咨询的评估意见。这份文件落在咨询 9 月 30 日截止前八天,是目前已公开意见中分量最重的一份。

    ESCB 的核心主张,是删除 MiCA 要求稳定币发行人把一部分储备存放在商业银行存款中的规定。现行规则下,电子货币代币(EMT)和资产参考代币(ART)发行人须至少把 30% 的储备放在银行存款里,被认定为“重要”(significant)的代币这一比例升至 60%。欧洲央行体系建议改用以到期期限为基础的流动性要求,即储备资产中须有一定比例在 1 个或 5 个工作日内到期,并点名隔夜逆回购和短期限主权债券作为可替代工具。

    维度 现行 MiCA 规则 ESCB 建议
    储备结构 至少 30% 存放在银行存款(重要代币 60%) 取消固定存款配额,改为按到期期限设门槛
    流动性口径 以“银行存款”这一资产类别界定 储备资产须在 1 或 5 个工作日内到期
    可替代工具 — 隔夜逆回购、短期限主权债券
    报酬禁令 CASP 不得对稳定币支付报酬(Article 40/50) 延伸至借贷、质押等间接收益场景
    “The current deposit mandate ‘creates a direct link between issuers and credit institutions’ and could leave banks facing liquidity problems if a stablecoin run forces an issuer to withdraw deposits quickly.”
    — ESCB response to MiCA targeted consultation, September 22, 2026

    这套说辞背后的现实教训是 2023 年 3 月的硅谷银行(SVB)危机:Circle 披露约 33 亿美元 USDC 储备存放在 SVB 后,USDC 一度脱锚。欧洲央行体系认为,固定比例的存款配额让发行人与单一信贷机构深度绑定,而在挤兑赎回时发行人反而要快速抽走存款,这既加剧银行的流动性压力,也让稳定币结构被迫承担它本要回避的银行对手方风险。Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino 自 2024 年起就一直警告这一条款的系统性风险,他曾在 2024 年 10 月的一个采访中举例:一个持有 100 亿欧元储备的稳定币,若 60% 存入银行,其中 90% 又会被银行贷出,最终真正留下的只有 6 亿欧元。Ardoino 也明确表示,正是这一条款让 Tether 拒绝了欧盟牌照。

    ESCB 并未止步于储备条款。它同时支持把“禁止支付报酬”(interest/reward ban)从 MiCA 已覆盖的服务延伸至加密借贷、质押等会复制存款利息经济效果的场景,还呼吁给 MiCA“完全去中心化豁免”一个明确定义,该豁免自出台以来从未被界定,而研究显示实践中几乎不存在完全去中心化的协议。同时,欧洲央行体系支持把 CASP 的牌照与监管从各成员国主管机构上收至 ESMA,并直言监管机构在处罚那些在欧盟外运营却仍触达欧盟客户的非合规公司时面临实质困难。

    EBA:把加密借贷与 DeFi 通道装进 MiCA 的服务清单

    9 月 24 日,欧洲银行管理局(EBA)针对欧盟委员会的 MiCA 定向咨询(86 个问题、覆盖 DeFi 与质押的第 4.2 节)提交了正式立场。EBA 与 ESMA 的联合研究显示,经由中介机构的加密借贷与借款已在至少 16 个成员国开展,却完全不落在 MiCA 的受监管服务清单内,因为 MiCA 从设计上就刻意把借贷与借款排除在外,Recital 94 明确把“可行性必要性”留给后续评估。

    EBA 建议欧盟委员会开展成本收益分析,考虑两条立法路径:一是把“加密借贷与借款的中介”直接列入 CASP 受监管服务;二是为那些帮助客户接入 DeFi 借贷协议的持牌服务商单独设置义务。在具体工具上,EBA 提出了零售用户进入借贷合同前的适当性测试、对部分或全部用户的杠杆上限、覆盖保证金维持、抵押品清算政策和对手方风险的披露要求,以及一个针对纳入受监管服务的 DeFi 借贷协议的认证制度。EBA 还提议禁止以未经 MiCA Title III/IV 授权的资产参考代币或电子货币代币为抵押发放贷款。

    “Easier interfaces and AI tools are blurring the line between centralised and decentralised activity, and the authority proposed suitability tests for crypto borrowing as well as leverage caps for some or all users.”
    — EBA submission to Commission MiCA consultation, September 24, 2026

    EBA 的立场与欧洲央行体系在“方向”上明显错位:中央银行的逻辑是要砍掉一项具体的储备安全垫,而 EBA 的逻辑是要在相邻领域叠加上限与披露。两者其实都指向同一个压力,MiCA 自 2024 年 12 月全面适用以来,已经触到自己的边界。EBA 特别把矛头对准第三国多发行人稳定币方案:由一个欧盟实体和一个非欧盟实体发行同一种可互换代币、储备分散在不同司法辖区,EBA 将这些方案列入“重大至非常重大”风险档,并建议若继续允许,应置于一个设有欧盟准入等效基线和额外危机管理权力的专门制度之下。

    一个市场,两个错位的政策信号

    把两份意见摆在一起,欧盟加密监管正在同时面对一个“放开”和一个“收紧”的诉求。这组数字最能说明市场的真实状态:截至 2026 年 9 月 1 日,MiCA 下仅有 39 个电子货币代币(EMT)获得授权,而资产参考代币(ART)的授权数量是零;全球前 50 大稳定币中,只有 3 个满足欧盟规则。加密借贷却在至少 16 个成员国真实运转,监管清单的空白与现实市场早已存在,这正是 EBA 与欧洲央行体系同时发力的原因。

    时间线同样关键。欧盟委员会于 5 月 20 日开启这次定向咨询,截止日期从原定的 8 月 31 日延至 9 月 30 日。按照 MiCA 第 140 条,委员会须在 2027 年 6 月 30 日前提交一份法规适用情况报告,并有机会附带立法提案。这意味着 9 月 30 日之前的所有反馈,都会成为下一版欧盟加密规则书的输入,而本轮没有任何实质规则在当天生效。

    围绕这次咨询的还有一连串配套动作。9 月 21 日,欧元体系上线了 Pontes 平台,让合格银行与市场基础设施运营商能以央行货币结算批发型代币化资产交易,德意志银行、桑坦德、法国兴业银行、欧洲投资银行等 13 家市场参与者已完成入驻。就在同一天,欧洲央行宣布将动用自有资金投资代币化证券并通过 Pontes 结算。先是周一推出央行结算基础设施,再到周二提交收紧私营替代方案的立场,这组节奏本身就是政策信号。英国的系统性英镑稳定币规则也在同期进入咨询截止,若英国敲定更宽松的储备结构而欧盟仍在争论,稳定币发行人将获得明确的动机选择英国作为面向欧盟客户群的注册地。

    对从业者的一些启示

    1
    稳定币的合规资产负债表正在被重写
    ESCB 想把 30%–60% 的银行存款配额换成 1–5 个工作日的期限门槛,本质是把“放哪家银行”变成“多久能到期”。无论最终走向如何,发行人都不该再把储备结构视为一次性合规动作,隔夜逆回购、短期限主权债券这类工具的储备设计能力,正在成为进入欧盟市场的核心竞争力。

    2
    加密借贷的监管窗口正在关闭
    EBA 明确提出要对 DeFi 借贷通道做适当性测试、杠杆上限与披露,并考虑协议认证制度。任何把欧盟零售客户接入 DeFi 借贷协议的持牌平台,都应把这轮咨询视作“规则即将到来”的前置信号,现在按合规架构设计,比规则落地后再改造要便宜得多。

    3
    “去中心化”不再是免死金牌
    ESCB 呼吁给 MiCA 的“完全去中心化豁免”一个明确定义,EBA 则认为接口与 AI 工具正在抹平中心化与去中心化的界限。那些依赖“我们足够去中心化所以不监管”来运作的项目,需要在定义落地前重新评估自己的架构是否还能站在豁免伞下。

    4
    英欧储备口径的落差就是套利窗口
    英国系统性英镑稳定币规则同期进入咨询截止,若英国最终采用更宽松的储备结构而欧盟仍悬而未决,稳定币发行人将面临一个清晰的结构性激励:选择英国作为面向欧盟客户群的注册地。跨司法管辖区的注册地策略,正在成为稳定币与 RWA 团队的战略议题。

  • One Loosens, One Tightens: The ECB and EBA Are Pulling MiCA in Two Directions

    One Loosens, One Tightens: The ECB and EBA Are Pulling MiCA in Two Directions

    One Loosens, One Tightens: The ECB and EBA Are Pulling MiCA in Two Directions

    Days before the EU’s MiCA targeted consultation closes on September 30, the European System of Central Banks wants to scrap the stablecoin bank-deposit reserve requirement while the EBA wants to extend the rules into crypto lending and DeFi.

    Article Summary

    On September 22, the European Central Bank and the central banks of all 27 EU member states, acting as the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), submitted a MiCA assessment proposing to remove the requirement for stablecoin issuers to hold 30%-60% of reserves in bank deposits, replacing it with liquidity thresholds based on 1-5 working-day maturities. Two days later, on September 24, the European Banking Authority (EBA) argued in its consultation response for bringing crypto lending and DeFi access into MiCA’s list of regulated services, proposing suitability tests, leverage caps and a protocol certification regime. One proposal loosens a reserve safeguard, the other expands the regulatory perimeter.

    The ESCB: Trading the 30%-60% Bank-Deposit Rule for a “Maturity Threshold”

    On September 22, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the central banks of all 27 EU member states, acting under the banner of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB), submitted their assessment of the MiCA targeted consultation to the European Commission. The filing landed eight days before the consultation closes on September 30 and is the most consequential submission made public so far.

    The ESCB’s core proposal is to delete the MiCA requirement that stablecoin issuers hold part of their reserves in commercial bank deposits. Under current rules, issuers of e-money tokens (EMT) and asset-referenced tokens (ART) must hold at least 30% of reserves as bank deposits, a share that rises to 60% for tokens classified as significant. The ESCB recommends replacing this with liquidity-based requirements keyed to maturity: a share of reserve assets would have to mature within one or five working days, with overnight reverse repos and short-dated sovereign bonds named as acceptable alternatives.

    Dimension Current MiCA rule ESCB proposal
    Reserve structure At least 30% in bank deposits (60% for significant) Drop fixed deposit quota, use maturity-based thresholds
    Liquidity basis Defined by the “bank deposit” asset class Reserve assets mature within 1 or 5 working days
    Alternatives — Overnight reverse repos, short-dated sovereign bonds
    Reward ban CASPs may not pay remuneration on stablecoins (Art. 40/50) Extend to lending, staking and other indirect-yield settings
    “The current deposit mandate ‘creates a direct link between issuers and credit institutions’ and could leave banks facing liquidity problems if a stablecoin run forces an issuer to withdraw deposits quickly.”
    — ESCB response to MiCA targeted consultation, September 22, 2026

    The real-world lesson behind this argument is the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) crisis of March 2023: after Circle disclosed that roughly $3.3 billion of USDC reserves sat at SVB, USDC briefly de-pegged. The ESCB argues that a fixed deposit quota ties issuers to individual credit institutions, and that during a redemption run an issuer must quickly pull deposits, amplifying bank liquidity stress while forcing the stablecoin structure to carry the very banking counterparty risk it was designed to avoid. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has warned about the systemic risk of this clause since 2024: in an October 2024 interview he estimated that a stablecoin with EUR 10 billion in reserves, holding 60% at a bank, would see 90% of that lent out, leaving only EUR 600 million truly available. Ardoino has also said this clause is why Tether refused an EU licence.

    The ESCB did not stop at the reserve clause. It also backs extending the prohibition on paying remuneration from MiCA-covered services to lending, staking and other arrangements that replicate the economics of a deposit, and calls for a definition of MiCA’s “fully decentralised” exemption, which has never been defined while research suggests full decentralisation is rarely achieved in practice. The ESCB also supports moving CASP licensing and supervision from national competent authorities to ESMA, and states that supervisors face material challenges enforcing MiCA against firms that continue to reach EU customers from outside the bloc without authorisation.

    The EBA: Putting Crypto Lending and DeFi Access Into MiCA’s Service List

    On September 24, the European Banking Authority (EBA) submitted its formal position on the Commission’s MiCA targeted consultation (86 questions, including Section 4.2 covering DeFi and staking). Joint research by the EBA and ESMA found that intermediated crypto borrowing and lending already operate in at least 16 member states, yet fall entirely outside MiCA’s list of regulated services, because MiCA deliberately excluded lending and borrowing by design, with Recital 94 leaving the feasibility and necessity assessment to a later review.

    The EBA recommends that the Commission carry out a cost-benefit analysis weighing two legislative paths: adding the intermediation of crypto borrowing and lending directly to the CASP regulated services, or placing separate obligations on licensed firms that help clients access DeFi lending protocols. Among the specific tools, the EBA proposes suitability tests before retail users enter credit contracts, leverage caps for some or all users, disclosure requirements covering margin maintenance, collateral liquidation policies and direct counterparty risk, and a certification regime for DeFi lending protocols integrated into regulated client services. The EBA also proposes prohibiting loans backed by asset-referenced or e-money tokens that lack authorisation under MiCA Title III or IV.

    “Easier interfaces and AI tools are blurring the line between centralised and decentralised activity, and the authority proposed suitability tests for crypto borrowing as well as leverage caps for some or all users.”
    — EBA submission to Commission MiCA consultation, September 24, 2026

    The EBA’s position is clearly misaligned with the ESCB’s in direction: the central banks want to strip out one specific reserve safeguard, while the EBA wants to stack caps and disclosure onto adjacent areas. Both point to the same pressure, that MiCA, fully applicable since December 2024, has already hit its limits. The EBA singled out third-country multi-issuer stablecoin schemes, in which an EU entity and a non-EU entity issue the same interchangeable token while reserves are split across jurisdictions, rating these schemes a “significant to very significant” risk and recommending that, if they remain permitted, they sit under a dedicated regime with an equivalence baseline for EU market access and additional crisis-management powers for EU supervisors.

    One Market, Two Misaligned Policy Signals

    Laid side by side, the two submissions show EU crypto regulation facing a “loosen” and a “tighten” demand at the same time. The numbers best capture the market’s real state: as of September 1, 2026, only 39 e-money tokens had been authorised under MiCA while the number of authorised asset-referenced tokens was zero; only three of the top 50 stablecoins meet EU rules. Yet crypto lending genuinely operates in at least 16 member states. The gap between an empty regulatory list and an already-existing market is exactly why the EBA and the ESCB acted in the same window.

    The timeline matters as much. The Commission opened this targeted consultation on May 20, and the deadline was extended from the original August 31 to September 30. Under Article 140 of MiCA, the Commission must deliver a report on the regulation’s application by June 30, 2027, potentially accompanied by a legislative proposal. Every response submitted before September 30 feeds the next version of the EU crypto rulebook, while no substantive rule takes effect on that day itself.

    The consultation is surrounded by a chain of parallel moves. On September 21, the Eurosystem launched Pontes, a platform that lets eligible banks and market infrastructure operators settle wholesale tokenised-asset transactions in central bank money, with 13 market participants onboarded, including Deutsche Bank, Santander, Societe Generale and the European Investment Bank. That same day, the ECB announced it would invest part of its own funds in tokenised securities settled via Pontes. Launching a central-bank settlement infrastructure on Monday and filing a case for tightening private alternatives on Tuesday is itself a policy signal. Britain’s systemic sterling stablecoin rules also hit their consultation deadline in the same window, and if the UK finalises a lighter reserve structure while the EU is still debating changes, stablecoin issuers gain a clear structural incentive to choose the UK as a domicile for EU-adjacent distribution.

    Implications for Practitioners

    1
    The compliant stablecoin balance sheet is being rewritten
    The ESCB wants to swap the 30%-60% bank-deposit quota for a 1-5 working-day maturity threshold, shifting the question from “which bank” to “how soon to maturity”. Whatever the final outcome, issuers should stop treating reserve structure as a one-time compliance exercise. The ability to design reserves around overnight reverse repos and short-dated sovereign bonds is becoming a core competence for entering the EU market.

    2
    The regulatory window on crypto lending is closing
    The EBA has explicitly proposed suitability tests, leverage caps and disclosure for DeFi lending access, and is weighing a protocol certification regime. Any licensed platform that routes EU retail clients into DeFi lending protocols should treat this consultation as an advance signal that rules are coming. Designing to a compliant architecture now costs less than a retrofit after the rules land.

    3
    “Decentralisation” is no longer a get-out-of-jail card
    The ESCB calls for a definition of MiCA’s fully-decentralised exemption, while the EBA argues that interfaces and AI tools are erasing the line between centralised and decentralised activity. Projects that rely on “we are decentralised enough to escape” should reassess whether their architecture still sits under the exemption umbrella before a definition is locked in.

    4
    The UK-EU reserve gap is an arbitrage window
    Britain’s systemic sterling stablecoin rules are hitting their consultation deadline in parallel. If the UK finalises a lighter reserve structure while the EU remains unresolved, stablecoin issuers face a clear structural incentive to choose the UK as a domicile for EU-adjacent distribution. Cross-jurisdictional domicile strategy is becoming a strategic issue for stablecoin and RWA teams.